Bitrix24 Cloud or On-Premise. Which Solution Fits Your Company?

Author Paul Streck

Paul Streck

19. July 2026

Your company wants to implement Bitrix24. But even before the project starts, a fundamental question arises: should Bitrix24 be used as a cloud solution or run as an On-Premise version on infrastructure of your own choosing?

At first glance, the difference seems simple. The cloud version runs on the provider's infrastructure, while Bitrix24 On-Premise is installed on your own or a rented server, or in a private cloud. In reality, however, this decision affects far more than just where the data is stored.

Among other things, the implementation and operating costs, the customization options, the internal IT effort, the handling of updates, the control over the infrastructure and the duration of the implementation all depend on it.

In this article, we explain the most important differences between Bitrix24 Cloud and On-Premise, compare the capabilities and effort of both variants, and show which questions companies should clarify before purchasing a license.

What Distinguishes Bitrix24 Cloud from On-Premise?

Bitrix24 is available in two fundamental variants.

Bitrix24 Cloud

The cloud version is provided as a ready-to-use online service. The company does not have to install Bitrix24 on its own server or operate the underlying software infrastructure itself. Employees access the system via the browser, the desktop application or the mobile app.

Updates are rolled out centrally. A large part of the technical tasks required to operate the platform is also handled by the provider. As a result, the system can usually be implemented comparatively quickly.

Bitrix24 Cloud is not only suitable for very small companies. Various cloud plans are available, differing in terms of feature scope and number of users. Depending on the plan, these include, among other things, CRM, task and project management, internal communication, automation, websites and other tools for daily collaboration.

Bitrix24 On-Premise

The On-Premise version is installed on infrastructure that the company itself selects and controls. This can be an in-house server, a rented server or a private cloud environment.

The company gains access to the administration, the database and the source code of large parts of the system. This makes it possible to customize the user interface and business logic more extensively, develop custom modules and connect individual internal systems.

However, this freedom comes with additional responsibility. The server environment must be prepared and operated. In addition, updates, backups, monitoring, security and recovery after possible failures must be organized.

These tasks can be handled by an internal IT team or by a specialized Bitrix24 partner.

The central difference can be summarized as follows:

Bitrix24 Cloud reduces the technical effort for the company. On-Premise offers more control and greater freedom, but requires additional resources for ongoing operation.

Are you unsure which version fits your company? WAM IT compares Bitrix24 Cloud and On-Premise based on your number of users, the required integrations, your data processing requirements and your existing internal IT resources.

Who Is Bitrix24 Cloud Suitable For?

The cloud version is particularly appealing when a company wants to get started quickly and does not want to build up separate infrastructure for Bitrix24.

Bitrix24 Cloud is usually a good fit when:

  • there is no in-house team for server administration;
  • the system does not necessarily have to run on infrastructure controlled by the company;
  • the most important processes can be mapped with the standard features of Bitrix24;
  • existing apps, APIs or middleware are sufficient for integrations;
  • the initial investment should remain manageable;
  • the company does not want to handle updates and server operation itself;
  • employees work remotely or at different locations;
  • Bitrix24 is to be implemented and expanded step by step.

An example: a service company wants to bring sales, customer inquiries, tasks and projects together in a central platform. It needs CRM, automatic reminders, document templates, telephony and reports. There is no in-house server infrastructure. At the same time, the processes do not require any changes to the source code.

In this case, the task can usually be implemented faster and with lower operating effort using Bitrix24 Cloud.

Cloud Does Not Mean That Individual Customizations Are Ruled Out

Some companies consider On-Premise solely because they want to adapt Bitrix24 to their own processes. However, individual requirements are not automatically a reason for the self-hosted version.

In Bitrix24 Cloud, too, you can, among other things:

  • create custom fields and directories;
  • configure different sales pipelines;
  • define roles and access rights;
  • use automation rules and triggers;
  • create business processes;
  • connect telephony, email and websites;
  • install apps;
  • exchange data with other systems via the API;
  • develop external integration solutions.

This is why it should first be checked whether the requirements can be implemented with the existing features, through automation or via an external integration.

On-Premise becomes relevant when the capabilities of the cloud no longer cover the actual project requirements.

Who Is Bitrix24 On-Premise Suitable For?

The On-Premise version is not necessary for every company. It becomes appealing above all when not only the configuration of the portal but also the technical operating environment must be controlled.

Bitrix24 On-Premise should be considered when:

  • there are special requirements for the storage and processing of data;
  • the system is to run in a controlled corporate environment;
  • access to the database and source code is required;
  • the user interface or system logic must be modified in depth;
  • Bitrix24 is to be connected with isolated internal systems;
  • complex or unusual business processes are used;
  • there are special requirements for performance and system architecture;
  • an in-house IT team or a reliable partner is available for operation;
  • the company is willing to organize updates, backups and security itself.

An example: a manufacturing company works with an ERP system, its own order management, internal databases and additional specialized applications. Bitrix24 is to receive customer and product data from several sources, pass orders on to the ERP and map individual approval processes.

If this architecture cannot be reliably realized via standard APIs and external applications, On-Premise can provide the flexibility needed for development.

Bitrix24 On-Premise is therefore aimed above all at companies that need comprehensive control over infrastructure and data, complex integrations, higher scalability or in-depth customizations. The Business and Enterprise editions are available, differing among other things in terms of the number of users and infrastructure options.

Is Bitrix24 On-Premise Fundamentally More Secure Than the Cloud?

It is often assumed that a system on your own server is automatically more secure than a cloud solution. In practice, this cannot be stated so categorically.

On-Premise does indeed give the company more control. It can decide for itself:

  • where the system runs;
  • who is granted access to the server;
  • how the network is structured;
  • which security measures are used;
  • how activities are logged;
  • where backups are stored;
  • how recovery is organized;
  • when updates are installed.

However, more control does not automatically lead to more security. What is decisive is how professionally the infrastructure is operated and monitored.

If updates are installed late, backups are not tested, access rights are assigned incorrectly or server states are not monitored, running things yourself can create additional risks.

In the cloud, the provider takes on part of the infrastructural tasks. The company, however, remains responsible for its internal processes. These include, for example, user rights, secure accounts, a sensible access configuration, employee training and binding rules for handling data.

The decisive question is therefore not: "Which is more secure: cloud or On-Premise?"

A more useful question is: "With which operating model can our company more reliably meet its requirements for data, access, backups and system operation?"

GDPR and the Decision Between Cloud and Your Own Server

For companies in Germany and the European Union, the choice is often closely linked to data protection and the GDPR.

However, On-Premise is not automatically GDPR-compliant simply because the system runs on your own server. Conversely, a cloud solution is not automatically unsuitable just because the infrastructure is provided externally.

When making the assessment, the following questions should be taken into account, among others:

  • Which personal data is processed?
  • Where and under what conditions is it stored?
  • Who is granted access to this data?
  • Which service providers are involved in the processing?
  • How are the contractual relationships regulated?
  • How are roles and permissions assigned?
  • How long is data stored?
  • How do deletion and data export work?
  • Which technical and organizational measures are implemented?
  • How does the company respond to potential security incidents?

On-Premise offers more options for designing the infrastructure and data protection processes yourself. At the same time, the company must organize and document considerably more measures on its own.

The decision about the hosting model should therefore be made together with IT managers and data protection officers. In doing so, it is not only Bitrix24 itself that needs to be considered, but the entire technical and organizational environment of the company.

Updates: Automatic Deployment or Full Control

In Bitrix24 Cloud, updates are provided centrally. The company does not have to download and install new platform versions itself.

The advantage lies in the lower IT effort. At the same time, the company cannot determine the timing of the product changes itself. When setting up processes and integrations, it should therefore be taken into account that the cloud platform is continuously evolving.

With On-Premise, the company decides for itself when an update is installed. A new version can first be checked in a test environment. Only once compatibility with extensions and integrations has been ensured is it adopted into the production system.

This control, however, requires regular technical work:

  1. New updates must be monitored and assessed.
  2. Before installation, a complete backup should be created.
  3. Customizations and integrations must be checked in a test environment.
  4. The technical work must be scheduled.
  5. After the update, the most important processes must be tested again.

Updates should not be postponed indefinitely. Outdated versions may not receive all necessary bug and security fixes. In addition, certain modern features may depend on a current platform version.

Bitrix24 also points out that individual features of the On-Premise version, including certain AI features, may use cloud components. A current On-Premise installation is therefore not in every case a fully isolated system.

Which Variant Is Cheaper?

For companies with largely standardized processes, the cloud usually requires lower initial investment. A dedicated server environment does not have to be purchased or set up. Many technical tasks are already part of the service.

On-Premise can make economic sense when a dedicated infrastructure is required for comprehensible reasons or when in-depth customizations create measurable business value.

Choosing the self-hosted version merely because of a desire for as much control as possible, on the other hand, is often not economical. The company may end up with a more complex and more expensive system, even though its requirements could also have been met in the cloud.

For a realistic comparison, the costs should be considered over a period of at least three years. These include:

  • licenses;
  • implementation;
  • infrastructure;
  • updates;
  • support;
  • integrations;
  • internal staff effort;
  • future scaling.

It is not only the license price that is decisive. What matters is the total cost over the entire lifecycle of the system.

Is a Switch from Cloud to On-Premise Possible?

Yes, a switch is possible in principle. However, it should be regarded as a standalone migration project and not as a simple change of plan.

Not all components of a portal can be transferred in the same way. Some of the data can be exported and imported via standard functions. For other content, REST APIs or specialized tools are needed.

Bitrix24 also provides for migration from the cloud to the On-Premise version, including with the support of a certified partner.

Before switching, it should be checked which data, automations, apps and integrations are affected. In addition, a permissible time window for the interruption and a fallback plan must be defined in case critical problems occur during the production launch.

Is a Switch from On-Premise to the Cloud Possible?

This switch, too, can make sense. For example, a company may want to reduce its internal IT effort, no longer need certain individual extensions, or review its ongoing infrastructure costs.

However, a migration to the cloud can become demanding if the On-Premise version has been heavily modified. Custom modules and customizations that directly access the database or modified source code cannot simply be transferred to the cloud.

In this case, several steps are necessary:

  1. It must be checked which features are actually used.
  2. Cloud alternatives must be found for individual extensions.
  3. Part of the integrations must be converted to API-based solutions.
  4. The data must be prepared for the migration.
  5. The limits of the chosen cloud plan must be checked.
  6. The most important processes must be tested in the new portal.

Before any migration, a technical audit of the existing system is therefore advisable. This should check not only whether a switch is possible, but also whether it is economically worthwhile.

Example of the Decision Between Cloud and On-Premise

Let us assume that a company wants to use Bitrix24 for sales, project management and handling customer inquiries. It employs 35 people and does not have its own system administrator.

Website, email and telephony can be connected via existing features. Data from the accounting system can be transferred via an API.

Although an integration is required, On-Premise will probably not be needed in this case. With the cloud version, the company can get started faster and does not have to build up its own technical operating environment.

The situation is different for a company with several branches and a complex internal system landscape. It uses an ERP system, its own databases and central corporate authentication. Certain applications can only be accessed from the internal network. Some processes cannot be mapped either with standard automations or via the API alone.

In this case, On-Premise can be a sensible solution, provided that the advantages of the dedicated architecture justify the costs for implementation and operation.

What is decisive: an integration alone does not yet make On-Premise necessary. What matters are the depth of the integration, the technical framework conditions and the required degree of system customization.

How WAM IT Supports the Selection and Implementation of Bitrix24

A wrong decision when choosing the version can lead either to unnecessary costs or to limitations that only become apparent after the project has started.

This is why Bitrix24 should be evaluated in the context of the company's actual processes, systems and goals before purchasing a license.

WAM IT guides companies through this decision process in a structured way.

  1. Analysis of the starting situation. First, the goals, existing processes, systems in use, number of users and data processing requirements are examined.
  2. Comparison of cloud and On-Premise. This is not only about features and license costs. Integration options, necessary customizations, infrastructure effort, ongoing operating costs, technical risks and future scalability are also assessed.
  3. Solution planning. Based on the analysis, a target picture for Bitrix24 emerges. This includes the user roles, the CRM structure, automations, integrations and the individual implementation phases.
  4. Configuration and development. WAM IT sets up Bitrix24 to match the company's processes, connects external systems, develops the necessary extensions and supports data migration.
  5. Training and ongoing support. After the launch, employees receive an understandably structured system and appropriate training. Afterward, WAM IT can further develop automations, resolve technical problems and adapt Bitrix24 to new business requirements.

In this way, the version is chosen not on the basis of a general list of pros and cons, but according to how well it fits the company's actual situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Bitrix24 Cloud Be Adapted to Individual Company Processes?

Yes. In the cloud, custom fields, multiple sales pipelines, access rights, automation rules, triggers, business processes, apps and APIs are available. For many companies, these options are entirely sufficient.

Is On-Premise Needed for the Integration of an ERP System?

Not necessarily. If the ERP system offers a suitable API, the integration can often be implemented with Bitrix24 Cloud as well.

On-Premise becomes relevant above all when systems are only accessible within an isolated network or when changes at the code and database level are required.

Is a Dedicated Physical Server Required for On-Premise?

No. The installation can be run on a server within your own company as well as in a suitable data center or in a private cloud environment.

What is decisive is that the infrastructure meets the technical requirements and is professionally maintained.

Who Installs the Updates for On-Premise?

The company handles this task itself or commissions a technical partner.

Before an update, backups should be checked and the compatibility of integrations and individual extensions tested.

Can a Company First Use the Cloud and Later Switch to On-Premise?

Yes. This approach can make sense when the company wants to get started quickly and it is not yet certain whether a dedicated infrastructure is actually required.

However, a possible later migration should already be taken into account in the original system architecture.

Is On-Premise Also Suitable for Small Companies?

Technically speaking, yes. What is decisive, however, is not the size of the company, but the specific requirements profile.

If a small company genuinely needs an isolated environment and in-depth customizations, On-Premise can make sense. If such requirements are absent, the cloud is usually simpler and more economical.

Should a Partner Be Commissioned for the Implementation of On-Premise?

A company can carry out the installation itself if the necessary technical competencies are available.

For complex implementations, migrations, integrations and individual developments, however, working with an experienced Bitrix24 partner is usually advisable.

Conclusion

Bitrix24 Cloud and On-Premise offer the central tools for CRM, tasks, projects and collaboration. However, they differ significantly in the way the system is operated and further developed.

The cloud enables a faster start and reduces the technical effort. It is suitable for companies for which standard configurations, automations and API-based integrations are sufficient.

On-Premise offers more control over infrastructure, code and architecture. At the same time, costs for server operation, updates, backups, security and technical support must be taken into account.

The decision therefore depends not only on the number of employees. What is important are the business processes, the required integrations, the data processing requirements, the existing IT resources and the long-term development plans.

Are you unsure which variant fits your company? WAM IT analyzes your requirements, your existing system landscape and the required integrations. On this basis, we compare Bitrix24 Cloud and On-Premise and recommend a solution that makes sense both technically and economically.

Arrange a free initial consultation on Bitrix24 and receive a first assessment of the suitable version, license and the expected implementation effort.